Blog

Insurance Contract of Adhesion

Definition of Contract of Adhesion?

A contract of adhesion exists when one party has significant control over the terms of the arrangement. Appropriate clauses must be included in order for an offeror to claim a contract of adhesion with a consumer.

Adhesion contracts are commonly used when multiple clients are involved in the same transaction, such as insurance, automobile purchases, leases, or mortgages.

Non-negotiable contract terms imply that the minority party in a contract cannot request that provisions be added, removed, or amended. Scholars or legal experts may refer to adhesion contracts as boilerplate agreements or standard-form contracts.

Boilerplate refers to terminology found in all similar legal documents, where standard phrasing is used in a formal agreement.

Because there is no evidence that the parties agreed to the terms of a boilerplate provision, it is read against the party who offered it.

Adhesion contracts are commonly used in the following industries:

-Real Estate Leases, Deeds, and Mortgages

-Policies of Insurance

-Automobile Purchases and Rentals

Definition of “Insurance Contract of Adhesion”

An insurance contract of adhesion requires the insured to accept the entire contract, including all terms and conditions. The insurer drafts and prints the policy, and the insured is generally required to accept the entire document and cannot insist on specific provisions being added or deleted, or the contract being rewritten to suit the insured.

Although the contract can be modified by adding endorsements, riders, or other forms, it is drafted by the insurer.

To correct the imbalance, the courts have ruled that any ambiguities or uncertainties in the contract are construed against the insurer. If the policy is unclear, the insured is given the benefit of the doubt.

Characteristics of Insurance Contract of Adhesion

• A boilerplate contract or form contract – A wide range of consumers use nearly identical language. Adhesion contracts are commonly used in automobile lease agreements, property leases, and consumer product sales.
• When two parties have unequal bargaining power, the weaker party has very little, if any, ability to negotiate terms. Because of the volume of business involved, the party with superior power can afford to take a “take it or leave it” approach.
• An adhesion contract is typically very one-sided because the more powerful party writes the language. For example, the contract will frequently include specific dispute resolution procedures that favour the more powerful party.

History of Contract of Adhesion

The term “adhesion contract” first appeared in American legal parlance around 1919. As a result, the term has been firmly established by judges and legal experts.

Adhesion contracts, on the other hand, can be found in France in the 18th and 19th centuries in causa civil proceedings, where Roman Catholic doctrines mandated that an agreement should enrich one of the parties involved in some way.

Insurance companies can use these variables to calculate the potential legal obligations and expected risks associated with the products they recommend. In 1919, the Harvard Law Review published an article by Edwin W. Patterson.

Following their reading of this paper, several courts in the United States accepted the concept of adhesion contracts. The California Supreme Court supported an adhesion analysis in 1962, hastening this acceptance.

The Doctrine of Contract of Adhesion

The doctrine of adhesion is a legal theory intended to avoid the problems associated with standardization. The rule of interpretation essentially states that if there is any uncertainty, insurance agreements must be considered against by the insurer.

The vagueness doctrine applies whenever the language of a policy is ambiguous, regardless of who wrote it.

All insurance policies are subject to the general rule that an insurance claim will be construed stringently against the insurance and liberally in favour of the insured. In general, when interpreting an insurance contract, no part of it can be ignored or rejected.

Nonetheless, the court has the authority to disregard or reject portions of the policy’s language if they are completely irrelevant, nonsensical, rendered inoperative, or inappropriate in light of the subject matter.

Challenging a Contract of Adhesion

People challenge their contracts every day, both adhesion contracts and other types of contracts. There are several ways to accomplish this. Some contracts are labelled “unconscionable” because the terms favour one party over the other.

FAQ’s